Dialin’ in the Importance of Safe Driving Policies
A survey of laws across Canada reveals that every province and territory, with the exception of Nunavut, has implemented a law against driving while using cell phones. (See the chart at the end for the applicable laws in each jurisdiction.) Although the language in the laws can vary—for example, some refer to “hand-held electronic devices,” while others to “hand-held communication devices”—they’re all, in essence, concerned with the risks to safety posed by distracted driving.
It shouldn’t come as a surprise that nearly all jurisdictions in Canada have chosen to address distracted driving through cell phone bans while driving. Although there’s no shortage of other potential distractions for drivers (i.e. passengers such as infants and pets, distractions outside of the car or eating), cell phones are one of the most common distractions, with texting while driving making a driver 23 times more likely to either be involved in a car crash or a near-miss as compared to an undistracted driver.
An article published in The New England Journal of Medicine reviewed two studies that considered the relationship between driving while performing secondary tasks, such as using a cell phone, and the risk of crashes and near-crashes. The studies distinguished between novice drivers (16.3 years to 17 years of age) and adults, who are presumed to have more driving experience. The studies found that, in the case of novice drivers, dialing or reaching for a cell phone were among several activities associated with a significantly increased risk of a crash or near-crash. The same conclusion was reached for more experienced drivers. However, the study notes that cell phone dialing was the only secondary task that posed an increased risk of a crash or near-crash for experienced drivers.
Although data on texting and using the internet while driving was unavailable at the time the study was conducted, considering that performing these actions on a smart phone are similar to dialing, one can assume the risks are the same. As between novice and experienced drivers, the odds of a crash or near-crash were found to be greater for novice drivers using a cell phone while driving. Bottom line: Distractions that take a driver’s eyes off the road ahead are significant risk factors for crashes and near-crashes, especially in the case of novice drivers.
With those findings in mind, employers should consider implementing workplace polices to address distracted driving and cell phone use for all workers but especially for young workers. Having and enforcing such policies are a critical component of an employer’s due diligence and will help protect workers who drive for work.
Where a worker’s required to drive as part of their job – whether their own vehicle or the company’s – employers must make clear that they expect workers to obey all driving laws, which includes not only obeying speed limits but also following cell phone use laws. Employers who issue company cell phones should be particularly careful to ensure that it’s clear to workers that although the employer may provide a cell phone, workers are not expected to answer their phones in violation of cell phone laws. Employers who do require constant contact with workers while on the road may also need to provide
workers with hands-free devices in addition to the cell phone. (Note that in some provinces, such as Saskatchewan, the laws prevent new drivers from using a hands-free device while driving.) Consider it another form of PPE that gives workers the tools they need to drive safely!
Common sense also suggests that the risks posed by cell phone use while driving a car would apply equally to workplace activities such as operating heavy machinery or high-powered mobile equipment. Policies (and enforcement of those policies) that restrict cell phone use on the shop floor or while operating machinery or equipment can go a long way to preventing distractions that could lead to incidents and injuries.
Ultimately, the increase in safety risks to workers who are distracted on the job, regardless of experience level or age, demonstrates the importance of implementing a cell phone usage policy that addresses driving distractions head-on. But policies and training to address distracted driving and cell phone use are even more crucial for young workers. It’s reasonable to conclude that new or young workers with little or no experience driving or using machinery or equipment would be at an increased risk as compared to workers who are more experienced in those tasks. Combine this risk with the fact that younger workers who have grown up with cell phones as a part of everyday life will be more inclined to want to keep using their phones while at work and it becomes clear that this safety hazard is particularly important to manage among young workers.
If your workplace doesn’t have a cell phone usage policy or you’d like your current policy reviewed, we’d be happy to assist. But please don’t call while driving!
|Province/Territory||Legislation Addressing Cell Phone Use While Driving|
|British Columbia||Motor Vehicle Act, RSBC 1996, c 318, Part 3.1|
|Alberta||Traffic Safety Act, RSA 2000, c T-6, s. 115.1|
|Saskatchewan||The Traffic Safety Act, SS 2004, c T-18.1, s. 241.1|
|Manitoba||The Highway Traffic Act, CCSM c H60, s. 215.1|
|Ontario||Highway Traffic Act, RSO 1990, c H.8, s. 78.1|
|Quebec||Highway Safety Code, CQLR c C-24.2, s. 439.1|
|New Brunswick||Motor Vehicle Act, RSNB 1973, c M-17 s. 265|
|Nova Scotia||Motor Vehicle Act, RSNS 1989, c 293, s. 100D(1)|
|Prince Edward Island||Highway Traffic Act, RSPEI 1988, c H-5, s. 291.1|
|Newfoundland and Labrador||Highway Traffic Act, RSNL 1990, c H-3, s. 176.1|
|Yukon||Motor Vehicles Act, RSY 2002, c 153, s. 210.1|
|Northwest Territories||Motor Vehicles Act, RSNWT 1988, c M-16, s. 155.1|
As published on OHS Insider: May 26, 2015 here.
DISCLAIMER: This article is presented for informational purposes only. The views expressed are solely the author(s)’ and should not be attributed to any other party, including Taylor McCaffrey LLP. While care is taken to ensure accuracy, before relying upon the information in this article you should seek and be guided by legal advice based on your specific circumstances. The information in this article does not constitute legal advice or solicitation and does not create a solicitor-client relationship. Any unsolicited information sent to the author(s) cannot be considered to be solicitor-client privileged.
If you would like legal advice, kindly contact the author(s) directly or the firm's Managing Partner Norm Snyder at email@example.com, or 204.988.0302.